It’s only when we point out these oddities, the viewers become aware of them. It’s an obscure thing that has no right or context to being in the movie, and it’s hardly noticeable even when asked to be aware. I think that’s at the heart of what we are dealing with here. I showed it again, and yet again she couldn’t see anything weird. I asked if she noticed anything out of ordinary. Yet the scene is there. I wouldn’t say I’m a devoted fan or anything, but I’ve seen the movie a number of times.Īs an experiment, I asked my friend to watch the scene without telling her anything. I personally do not remember this scene, but I was just like the others in believing there’s no way the Scarecrow had a gun. Take a look at the following scene below: The Mandela Effect here is that people do not remember the gun and are convinced that either this scene never existed or he never had a gun. It seems like the gun that the Scarecrow is holding is the most shocking to people. The items possessed by the other members are usually not even mentioned within the Mandela Effect community when reporting on it. That isn’t it however the Tinman has a wrench (along with his normal axe), the Lion has a bug catching net, and a two-handed pump sprayer with the words “WITCH REMOVAL” (or REMOVER), and the Scarecrow actually has another item that isn’t seen or heard from again after the scene a walking staff/stick. It features a scene where the Scarecrow inexplicably has a revolver firearm. Frank Baum and produced by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. The Wizard of Oz is a 1939 musical/fantasy/comedy film adapted from the 1900 novel, “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz” by L.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |